Question
Question asked by Filo student
In higher eukaryotic cells, nuclear localization signals in a protein are not cleaved off after transport into the nucleus, whereas the signal sequences for import into other organelles are often removed after import. Why do you think it is critical for nuclear localization signals remain attached to their proteins? I see that many people use mitosis as a reason for why the NLS signal is not cleaved off, but we have not discussed mitotic cell division in this class at all, which leads me to think that my professor expects an answer unrelated to that. Could you provide an example that does not use mitosis as a reason to keep the NLS sequence?
Found 8 tutors discussing this question
Discuss this question LIVE
15 mins ago
Filo tutor solution
Learn from their 1-to-1 discussion with Filo tutors.
Generate FREE solution for this question from our expert tutors in next 60 seconds
Don't let anything interrupt your homework or exam prep with world’s only instant-tutoring, available 24x7
Practice more questions on All topics
Question 1
Medium
Views: 5,123
Question 4
Easy
Views: 5,646
Students who ask this question also asked
Question 1
Views: 5,755
Question 2
Views: 5,760
Question 3
Views: 5,274
Question 4
Views: 5,214
Question Text | In higher eukaryotic cells, nuclear localization signals in a
protein are not cleaved off after transport into the nucleus,
whereas the signal sequences for import into other organelles are
often removed after import. Why do you think it is critical for
nuclear localization signals remain attached to their proteins?
I see that many people use mitosis as a reason for why the NLS
signal is not cleaved off, but we have not discussed mitotic cell
division in this class at all, which leads me to think that my
professor expects an answer unrelated to that. Could you provide an
example that does not use mitosis as a reason to keep the NLS
sequence? |
Topic | All topics |
Subject | Biology |
Class | Class 11 |