World's only instant tutoring platform
dropdown-logo
Get 2 FREE Instant-Explanations on Filo with code FILOAPP
Question

Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country?

A
Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.

B
Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of the country.

C
Government fears its defeat in the next elections.

D
People are free to believe in and practise any religion.

tutor 0tutor 1tutor 2
Found 5 tutors discussing this question
Discuss this question LIVE
11 mins ago

Text SolutionText solutionverified iconVerified

Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.
Was this solution helpful?
150
Share
Report
One destination for complete JEE/NEET preparation
One destination to cover all your homework and assignment needs
Learn Practice Revision Succeed
Instant 1:1 help, 24x7
Instant 1:1 help, 24x7
60, 000+ Expert tutors
60, 000+ Expert tutors
Textbook solutions
Textbook solutions
Big idea maths, McGraw-Hill Education etc
Big idea maths, McGraw-Hill Education etc
Essay review
Essay review
Get expert feedback on your essay
Get expert feedback on your essay
Schedule classes
Schedule classes
High dosage tutoring from Dedicated 3 experts
High dosage tutoring from Dedicated 3 experts
Trusted by 4 million+ students
filo Logo
Doubt Icon Doubt Icon

Stuck on the question or explanation?

Connect with our social_science tutors online and get step by step solution of this question.

231 students are taking LIVE classes
Question Text
Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country?
Answer TypeText solution:1
Upvotes150